Can We Trust the Gospels?

Recent Posts

Past Posts Archived by Date

Search this site


Search this site


« The Second Station: Jesus, Betrayed by Judas, is Arrested | Home | The Fourth Station: Peter Denies Jesus »

The Third Station: Jesus is Condemned by the Sanhedrin

By Mark D. Roberts | Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Copyright © Linda Roberts, 2007.
For permission to use this picture and/or others in this series, please contact Mark D. Roberts

Luke 22:66-71

66 When day came, the assembly of the elders of the people, both chief priests and scribes, gathered together, and they brought him to their council. 67 They said, “If you are the Messiah, tell us.” He replied, “If I tell you, you will not believe; 68 and if I question you, you will not answer. 69 But from now on the Son of Man will be seated at the right hand of the power of God.” 70 All of them asked, “Are you, then, the Son of God?” He said to them, “You say that I am.” 71 Then they said, “What further testimony do we need? We have heard it ourselves from his own lips!”


According to Jewish law, it was wrong to try a criminal in the night. So, properly, those who accused Jesus waited until dawn, when the “assembly” or “council” could legally gather (the “council” is, more literally, the “Sanhedrin,” see Note 1). The leaders of the council, which was moderated by the high priest, wanted to know if Jesus claimed to be the Messiah. For them, this would be tantamount to a revolutionary claim, exactly the sort of thing that got the Jews into major trouble with Rome. False messiahs led to nothing but heartache and suffering for the Jewish people. Given Jesus’ failure to raise up an army suitable to rid Judea of the Romans, there would have been little reason for the members of the Sanhedrin to believe that he was the true messiah. He didn’t fit the bill, as far as they were concerned.

This may help to explain Jesus’ strange reticence with respect to his messiahship. Nowhere in the Gospels does he ever say, outright, “I am the Messiah.” Only twice does Jesus admit plainly to being the Messiah (Mark 14:62; John 4:25-26), but then he quickly changes the subject.

Of course Jesus didn’t deny that he was the Messiah either, something that might have allowed him to be released by the Sanhedrin with only a severe beating. His failure to say that he was not the Messiah, combined with his cryptic, “You say that I am,” was enough to convince the Sanhedrin of Jesus’ guilt.

What was His crime? What had he done that was worthy of death?

For one thing, only days earlier, Jesus had made a mess of the temple, interrupting its sacrifices and labeling it as a “den of robbers,” a phrase Jesus borrowed from Jeremiah in one of the ancient prophet’s predictions of the temple’s demise. By speaking so negatively of the temple, Jesus was seen by the Jewish officials to be speaking negatively of God Himself. The temple was, after all, the house of God, the place where God had chosen to dwell. Thus by speaking poorly of the temple, Jesus was believed to have been blaspheming God.

Moreover, in his trial, Jesus not only wouldn’t reject his Messiahship, but also he claimed that he would be “seated at the right hand of the power of God” as the promised Son of Man (Luke 22:69). This was perceived by the council, beginning with the high priest, as blasphemy and clear evidence of Jesus’ guilt. But making this claim wouldn’t have been a crime if Jesus was telling the truth. In the minds of the members of the Sanhedrin, however, there was no possibility of Jesus actually being the Son of Man who would share in God’s own power and glory. Sure, he could do a few miracles. But usher in the divine kingdom? Hardly. Jesus’ ministry hardly filled out the expectations of the Jewish leaders for the genuine Messiah. So the rabble-rousing, temple-destroying, and all-around troublemaker was now, as far as the Sanhedrin was concerned, an obvious blasphemer (Note 2).

Have you ever wondered why Jesus wasn’t clearer about who he was and what he had come to do? I certainly have. It seems like it would have been so much easier for all, including those of us who seek to follow Jesus today, if he had only said, “Yes, I am the Messiah, but not in the sense you expect. I have been anointed by God to bring the kingdom, but not in a military-political way. The kingdom is coming through transformed hearts, communities, and cultures. Most of all, the kingdom is coming through my death, as I bear the sin of Israel, and, indeed, the sin of the world. As Messiah, I must also suffer in the role of Isaiah’s Servant.” That simple but profound paragraph would have cleaned things up quite nicely.

Yet Jesus didn’t say this. It’s something we have to piece together from his words and deeds. And we, like the people of his day, even his disciples, often get things confused. We rightly reject the notion of Jesus as a military-political Messiah. But then we tend to limit his saving work to post-mortem heaven for individual believers, rather than transformation of the whole cosmos, beginning with ourselves and our world today. We don’t make the connection between Jesus as the Messiah and the prayer he himself taught us: “Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.”

When we confess Jesus as Christ or Messiah (Note 3), we’re acknowledging him as our personal Savior. But we’re saying more than this. We’re also recognizing that he came to inaugurate the kingdom of God. Though this kingdom won’t fully come until Jesus himself brings it in the future, we get to share in the blessings and responsibilities of the kingdom even now. Our calling as followers of Jesus is to do the works of the kingdom, so that the reign of God might invade this world. At the same time, we look forward to the day when all will be fulfilled. Then, in the classic words of Revelation 11:15, put to such wonderful music in Handel’s Messiah, we’ll celebrate the fact that:

The kingdom of this world is become,
The kingdom of our Lord, and of His Christ,
And He shall reign forever and ever.


O Lord, the Jewish officials didn’t understand what it meant for you to be Messiah, and they condemned you as a criminal worthy of death. Your own followers didn’t understand what it meant for you to be Messiah, so they scattered and hid in your hour of crisis. Help me not to be like these! Help me to understand what it means when I confess you to be the Christ, the Messiah, the Anointed of God. And may this confession lead me to a life of true discipleship.

Let Your kingdom come, Lord, and your will be done, on earth as in heaven. And let this happen in my life, even today!



Note 1: The Greek word for “assembly” in Luke 22:66 is presbyterion (which we’d translated literally as “presbytery,” not good news for us Presbyterians; the word for “council” is synedrion, which is often translated into English as “Sanhedrin.”)

Note 2: Not all members of the Sanhedrin agreed that Jesus was guilty and worthy of death. Joseph of Arimathea, for example, “had not agreed to their plan and action” (Luke 23:51). For more on why Jesus had to die, see my blog series: Why Did Jesus Have to Die? The Death of Jesus in Different Perspectives: Roman, Jewish, Jesus, Christian.

Note 3: “Christ” is an English variation of the Greek word christos, which is equivalent to the Hebrew mashiach, or “messiah.” They all mean “anointed one.”

Topics: Stations of the Cross |

2 Responses to “The Third Station: Jesus is Condemned by the Sanhedrin”

  1. Thomas Buck Says:
    March 31st, 2009 at 2:53 am

    Hi, Rev. Roberts!

    Thanks again for the series this year. A good way to prepare for Easter.

    My Bible does not have a Mk 1:62. Is there another verse I should be looking for?

    Nice pictures by the Mrs., by the way.



  2. Mark Roberts Says:
    March 31st, 2009 at 6:51 am

    Tom: Ah, now you know why it’s so hard to find where Jesus admits to being the Messiah. It’s those hidden verses! Or else it is actually Mk 14:62, not Mk 1:62. Thanks for the edit.


Thanks for your willingness to make a comment. Note: I do not moderate comments before they are posted, though they are automatically screened for profanities, spam, etc., and sometimes the screening program holds comments for moderation even though they're not offensive. I encourage open dialogue and serious disagreement, and am always willing to learn from my mistakes. I will not delete comments unless they are extraordinarily rude or irrelevant to the topic at hand. You do need to login in order to make a comment, because this cuts down on spam. You are free to use a nickname if you wish. Finally, I will eventually read all comments, but I don't have the time to respond to them on a consistent basis because I've got a few other demands on my time, like my "day job," my family, sleep, etc.

You must be logged in to post a comment.