« Advent Calendar for December 9 | Home | Advent Calendar for December 10 »
My Response to N.T. Wright at Laity Lodge
By Mark D. Roberts | Monday, December 10, 2007
Part 10 of series: Sharing Laity Lodge
Permalink for this post / Permalink for this series
In my last post in this series I reported on the recent visit of N.T. Wright to Laity Lodge and shared my introduction of him to the retreat there. In this post I want to share some of my responses to Bishop Tom, as he likes to be called.
A Sense of the Man
Until I met Bishop Tom a couple of weeks ago, I knew him almost completely through his writings. Over the years I’ve probably read well over 2,000 pages of his books, which I regard as among the finest works of biblical scholarship I’ve ever read. As I anticipated meeting him in person, I wondered what he’d be like. Over the years I’ve met dozens of prominent religious and academic leaders. Many come across as arrogant stuffed shirts, while others seem perfectly normal and rather unimpressed with themselves. (Photo: Bishop Tom at Laity Lodge)
I’m happy to report that Bishop Tom fits into the second category. He didn’t seem to be looking for homage or praise. In fact, he seemed embarrassed by my rather “over-the-top” introduction. Shortly after we met, I asked him what he preferred to be called. “‘Bishop Tom’ seems to be most common,” he said, “but I’m a fairly informal person, so I don’t mind if people forget the ‘Bishop’ just use ‘Tom.’”
Throughout his two days at Laity Lodge, Bishop Tom was at ease in conversations with a wide range of people. In fact, he seemed genuinely interested in the ideas and stories of the retreatants. In the rather long Q&A session during the retreat, he responded to all questions with respect and kindness.
Whatever else one might say about Bishop Tom and his ideas, he clearly seeks to live out his Christian faith in ordinary interactions with ordinary people.
Bishop Tom the Pastor
For the most part, Bishop Tom taught us during his time at Laity Lodge because this is what we asked him to do. He did so with great gusto. In fact, he often moved into a mode I would call preaching. It was clear that the ideas he shared were not just intellectual curiosities, but matters of passion and commitment. He really believes that all of this kingdom of God stuff can really change our lives, our churches, and, ultimately, the world.
Since I think of Bishop Tom mostly as a scholar and a writer, I was moved to hear of his pastoral concern for the people and churches within his diocese, the Diocese of Durham in England. He spoke of how much he desires to bring the hope of the gospel to the parishes over which he is bishop, many of which are struggling financially and spiritually. He also shared about praying for each his couple hundred parishes on a weekly basis. This wasn’t a matter of boasting, by the way, but rather an encouragement to us to pray faithfully.
On several occasions, both prior to and after his messages, Bishop Tom led us in prayer. I found his prayers strikingly simple. He didn’t even use some of the Anglicanisms that one might expect from a bishop. His language was more common than churchy. Usually he prayed to “Father,” much as Jesus taught us. It’s quite clear that Bishop Tom, though a high-ranking official in the Anglican Church, and though a top-notch scholar, is a man of genuine, humble faith in God through Jesus Christ. His pastoral care and, indeed, his scholarly writing, is an expression of this fundamental faith.
Of course you don’t get to know someone intimately in only two days. But I must say that my two days with Bishop Tom were impressive in ways I didn’t expect.
In tomorrow’s post I’ll explain yet another way Bishop Tom impressed me and, in fact, challenged me.
Topics: Sharing Laity Lodge |
7 Responses to “My Response to N.T. Wright at Laity Lodge”
Comments
Thanks for your willingness to make a comment. Note: I do not moderate comments before they are posted, though they are automatically screened for profanities, spam, etc., and sometimes the screening program holds comments for moderation even though they're not offensive. I encourage open dialogue and serious disagreement, and am always willing to learn from my mistakes. I will not delete comments unless they are extraordinarily rude or irrelevant to the topic at hand. You do need to login in order to make a comment, because this cuts down on spam. You are free to use a nickname if you wish. Finally, I will eventually read all comments, but I don't have the time to respond to them on a consistent basis because I've got a few other demands on my time, like my "day job," my family, sleep, etc.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
December 10th, 2007 at 2:08 am
What is your view on the New Perspective on Paul tauted by Biship Wright?
I recently read “Simply Christian” by Wright and came away really disapointed with how he describes (or doesn’t) justification.
Mind you, I think Jesus, and the Victory of God and other writings are fine, and he has some good things to post modern sorts, but everytime I hit something he says on justification, the transmission seems really garbled.
December 10th, 2007 at 7:08 am
Did N.T. Wright indicate that he had read or was otherwise familiar with John Piper’s “The Future of Justification: A Response to N.T. Wright” published by Crossway Books?
December 10th, 2007 at 9:21 am
I’ll put up some comments on the New Perspective in a day or so. Bishop Tom mentioned that he had read a draft of Piper’s book and had sent back extensive comments.
I think that for folks who put a ton of weight down on the Reformed understanding of justification, Wright’s treatment will seem inadequate. The challenge for his critics is to show, not that Wright disagrees with Reformation or Reformed doctrine on justification, but that he somehow misreads Paul. This is a much harder challenge for Wright’s critics, I think. I’m hoping that Piper’s book will contribute to a healthy dialogue on the matter. Our goal, after all, is to discover what Paul really meant when we spoke of justification.
December 10th, 2007 at 9:37 am
Rick,
Wright is definitely familiar with Piper’s work as this interview indicates.
December 10th, 2007 at 11:04 am
Rick and Justin: Yes, he is. He spoke favorably of Piper’s effort to share a draft with him. This is the kind of communication, by Piper to Wright and Wright back to Piper, that so helps us get at the truth. Both men are greatly to be commended and imitated, I think.
December 10th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
I was at the retreat, too. When Bishop Tom talked about Piper’s book, he spoke with great respect for Piper himself. In fact, he seemed humbled that someone would base an entire book on refuting him. Above all, though, he didn’t seem at all defensive about other people challenging his views and opinions. More than anything during the weekend, he reminded all of us to get back to the study of Scripture. Certainly, he has his beliefs and interpretations, but he seemed much more interested in explaining the truth of Christianity in a way that our currently world will understand.
December 11th, 2007 at 1:34 pm
Justin, Thanks for the link. It was just what I needed. Good interviewer,too. He asked many of the questions I’ve wondered about concerning N.T. Wright. I can understand why the emerging church movement likes him so much as well as why my Reformed tribe has serious concerns about his new perspective on Paul. Prior to this interview, the only thing I had read by Wright was “The Meaning of Jesus: Two Visions” with Marcus Borg.
Dr. Roberts, Thanks for this series.